Recent Forum Posts
From categories:

I am new to this site and so here goes.

I have been collecting English Bible translations since 1968 and have seen a great increase in what you must pay for them. Yes, the dollar value has gone done but the difference is to large to be credited to that. However, I was a seller and a buyer on e-Bay. I believe that e-Bay is the cause for the increase in the price of Bibles. I agree with Ambrose completely for most people do NOT know what the real value of Bibles should be. They see a Bible 100 yrs old and say "wow, I have got to have that" and will bid up the price until they out bid others who don't know the true value either. Thus, inflated prices. The same can be said for the sellers.

Normally, Bibles are not considered old unless from the early 1700s and back. Normally speaking, there are a few translations done by individuals from the 1800s that have a high value. Most, but not all, Bibles with errors have a preminum value. However, only those from about 1830 back to 1530. (A list of these are in my book.)

Because sellers on e-Bay, no matter the reason, get high prices for their Bibles, professional book sellers are now pricing their Bibles based on e-Bay prices.

This is also true for most books today. An example would be my book. It's still in print after 17 years and sells NEW for $295. I just went to ABE.com and two were listed used. One priced at over $400 and the other for over $700. Both are forsale by professional book dealers. Now, who will ever purchased from them when the NEW is selling on amazon.com, B&N, and other places much, much lower than their price for used copies.

I have found that if you don't buy at the inflated price, you will never be able to buy what you want or and need. That is exactly why I have not been able to purchase any Bible translations in the last three years.

All of this makes it rather hard for me when I do an appraisel for a Bible.

Re: A word about valuation by billchbillch, 1218064707|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

I have seen some descriptions posting a dollar value for a particular edition. I think this is a fine idea. However I don't think using Ebay prices is useful at all. There are too many situations whereby an Ebay price may not reflect the actual price paid. Ebay sellers also may not be qualified to identify a book, or even describe it properly. It is for that reason, that I believe only reputable auction house prices should be quoted for value. This is a well documented type of price for which records are maintained. Otherwise, people may as well just stick in whatever price they feel something is worth, as ABE, Ebay or other internet sources are just not verifiable except for a short duration, and maybe not even then. Thoughts?

A word about valuation by AmbroseSJAmbroseSJ, 1204566113|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

In my directorydirectory of online Bible translations I link to any known electronic copies or references to hardcopy facsimiles and reprints, I suggest this would also enhance The Internet Bible Catalog. For instance a rare translation like William Whiston's Primitive NT may be downloadeddownloaded for free as a facsimile in PDF as a part of the Microsoft Live Book Search.

Links to electronic and hard copies? by PetorisenPetorisen, 1188579685|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

Beautiful! Great work. Thanks!

Re: Printer friendly pages by skodouayskodouay, 1188097767|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

I tried increasing the size of the pictures from "thumbnail" to "small" and I think the pages look better. I have started changing over the pages starting with "A" so it may take some time before they are all changed over. Look and some of the "A" pages and see what you think.

Re: Printer friendly pages by Bible_wikiBible_wiki, 1188094330|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

I just tried a new layout for the pages. It eliminates the side navigation bar and replaces it with a series of top navigation bars. Everything is still there - just at the top. I am not 100% satisified with how the "add page" works - but it does appear to work. Let me know what you think.

As to the pictures on the sides. Others sizes are available from "thumbnail" to "fullsize". I will experiment with various options and see what is practical.

Thanks for the comments.

Re: Printer friendly pages by Bible_wikiBible_wiki, 1188092292|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

When pages are printed now, about 1/3 of the left hand side of each page is wasted and the title page pictures are mostly illegible except for the largest type. Could a page be designed to fill up laterally, and make the images larger? Thanks!

Printer friendly pages by skodouayskodouay, 1188084511|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

How should Bible Version entries be arranged? Several possibilities include:

1) Alphabetical based on either the version name of translator name. Advantage - easy to find a given entry. Disadvantage - does not reveal any structure.

2) Topical based on general criteria. For example a section on Complete Bibles versus portions versus New Testaments. Or topics based on who created the version (original languages, Jewish, Catholic, Protestant, other)

3) Chronological - listed by date.

What do you think?

Site Organization question by Bible_wikiBible_wiki, 1187292152|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
Unless stated otherwise Content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License